False Faces Even if evolutionists are unsuccessful in finding scientific evidence to shore up their theories, they are very successful at one thing: propaganda. The most important elements of this propaganda are the false drawings and designs known as "reconstructions." Reconstruction can be explained as drawing a picture or constructing a model of a living thing based on a single bone that has been unearthed. The "ape-men" we see in newspapers, magazines, or films are all reconstructions. The sketches of evolutionists depict imaginary creatures even in their social setting. Based on no evidence, these illustrations are nothing but propaganda tools. The important thing here is how scientific these drawings are. Since fossils are usually disordered and incomplete, any conjecture based on them is likely to be totally imaginative. As a matter of fact, the reconstructions made by evolutionists based on the fossil remains are prepared precisely to suit the purposes of the evolutionary thesis. THE THREE FACES OF ZINJANTHROPUS Evolutionists go so far in imaginary drawings that they even ascribe different faces to the same skull. The three different reconstructed drawings made for the fossil named Australopithecus robustus (Zinjanthropus) is an example of this. Another famous example of the imagination of evolutionists was the "Nebraska Man" scandal. This was cooked up in 1922 on the basis of a single molar tooth found in Nebraska, USA. With nothing to go on but this single tooth, evolutionists published imaginary drawings of the Nebraska Man and his "wife". It was revealed in 1929 that the tooth in fact belonged to a wild pig. 1. N. Parker's drawing (National Geographic, September 1960) 2. Maurice Wilson's drawing 3. Appeared in Sunday Times (April 5, 1964 To attempt to restore the soft parts is an even more hazardous undertaking. The lips, the eyes, the ears, and the nasal tip leave no clues on the underlying bony parts. You can with equal facility model on a Neanderthaloid skull the features of a chimpanzee or the lineaments of a philosopher. These alleged restorations of ancient types of man have very little if any scientific value and are likely only to mislead the public… So put not your trust in reconstructions.62 Evolutionists animate the creatures that exist only in their imagination by using the method of "reconstruction" and present them to people as if they are "their ancestors". When they are unable to find the "half-man half-ape" creatures in the fossil record, they prefer to deceive the public with false drawings. BE CAREFUL WITH THE SOFT TISSUES! Soft tissues like the eye, nose, ear, skin, hair leave no clues in the fossil record. Yet evolutionists shape these tissues as they wish in the reconstructions they fabricate in their workshops and produce "half-ape half-man" creatures as we see here. Footnotes 64) Earnest A. Hooten, Up From The Ape, New York: McMillan, 1931, S. 332